18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kenda KR41 Emera A1 vs. Nokian WetProof

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kenda (58%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the KR41 Emera A1 and the WetProof were tested. See more mutual tests below.

Test Profile

Kenda
KR41 Emera A1
Nokian
WetProof
Number of tests
2
14
Best position
#7
#1
Average position
13.0
5.6
Latest test
2019
2023
Available sizes
47

Wet

Wet
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
91%
Nokian WetProof
84%

Costs

Costs
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
45%
Nokian WetProof
60%

Dry

Dry
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
96%
Nokian WetProof
78%

Comfort

Comfort
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
80%
Nokian WetProof
79%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2019225/45 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2019225/45 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison