18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kenda KR41 Emera A1 vs. Nokian WetProof

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kenda (58%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the KR41 Emera A1 and the WetProof were tested. See more mutual tests below.

Test Profile

Kenda
KR41 Emera A1
Nokian
WetProof
Number of tests
2
14
Best position
#7
#1
Average position
13.0
5.6
Latest test
2019
2023
Available sizes
47

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
89%
Kenda
KR41 Emera A1
Nokian WetProof
89%
Nokian
WetProof
Wet Handling
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
94%
Nokian WetProof
98%
Wet Circle Cornering
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
85%
Nokian WetProof
100%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
92%
Nokian WetProof
82%
Aquaplaning Cross
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
85%
Nokian WetProof
75%
Dry Performance
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
96%
Kenda
KR41 Emera A1
Nokian WetProof
97%
Nokian
WetProof
Dry Handling
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
96%
Nokian WetProof
97%
Comfort & Noise
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
80%
Kenda
KR41 Emera A1
Nokian WetProof
97%
Nokian
WetProof
Noise Exterior
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
80%
Nokian WetProof
97%
Economy
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
45%
Kenda
KR41 Emera A1
Nokian WetProof
63%
Nokian
WetProof
Rolling Resistance
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
47%
Nokian WetProof
62%
Mileage
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
43%
Nokian WetProof
63%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2019225/45 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison