18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kenda KR41 Emera A1 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Kenda
KR41 Emera A1
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
2
3
3
Best position
#7
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
Available sizes
34
40

Wet

Wet
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
91%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet circle cornering
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
85%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet handling
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
94%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
85%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
92%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Costs

Costs
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
45%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
43%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rolling resistance
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
47%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Dry

Dry
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
96%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry handling
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
96%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison