18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kenda KR41 Emera A1 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Kenda
KR41 Emera A1
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
2
14
3
Best position
#7
#8
#2
Average position
13.0
13.4
3.3
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
Available sizes
153
60

Wet

Wet
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet circle cornering
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet handling
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
94%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Costs

Costs
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
45%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Mileage
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
43%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Price/value
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
40%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
47%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%

Dry

Dry
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry handling
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison