18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kenda KR41 Emera A1 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kenda
KR41 Emera A1
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
2
14
3
3
Best position
#7
#8
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
13.4
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
153
40
34

Wet

Wet
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
94%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Costs

Costs
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
45%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
43%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
47%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison