18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Kenda KR41 Emera A1 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Kenda KR41 Emera A1

Kenda

KR41 Emera A1

VS

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Kenda (58%). The first tyre test of Kenda KR41 Emera A1 was done in 2019, compared to 2021 when was the BFGoodrich Advantage first tested.

Test Profile

Kenda

KR41 Emera A1

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Number of tests

2

14

Best position

#7

#8

Average position

13.0

13.4

Latest test

2019

2026

Available sizes

—

153

Wet

Wet

Kenda KR41 Emera A1

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kenda KR41 Emera A1

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kenda KR41 Emera A1

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Wet circle cornering

Kenda KR41 Emera A1

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Wet handling

Kenda KR41 Emera A1

94%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Costs

Costs

Kenda KR41 Emera A1

45%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Price/value

Kenda KR41 Emera A1

40%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Rolling resistance

Kenda KR41 Emera A1

47%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Mileage

Kenda KR41 Emera A1

43%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Dry

Dry

Kenda KR41 Emera A1

96%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Dry handling

Kenda KR41 Emera A1

96%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Comfort

Comfort

Kenda KR41 Emera A1

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Exterior noise

Kenda KR41 Emera A1

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison