Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

The two tyres we are comparing today are the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 and the Pirelli P ZERO. Both are excellent summer tyres, but their performance varies in different conditions and tests.

The Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117, a product of Hankook, hails high scores in tests focused on 'Dry driving behavior', 'Exterior noise', 'Wet braking'. Climbing to a significant top-third position in most of the tests, it implies great all-round performance. The Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 has not been replaced by a newer version and continues to be a popular choice.

On the other hand, Pirelli's P ZERO, which is made in Italy, shines noticeably in tests related to 'Dry braking', 'Wet braking', 'Wet circle cornering' and 'Wet handling'. Although across the tests it shows some variability in positions, its strong features play a deciding role and mark the tyre a notable contender for summer use. Like the Hankook Ventus, the P ZERO has also not been replaced by a newer model.

When comparing their positions in mutual tests, we see a distinct difference. In the 'Gute-Fahrt' and 'ACE' tests for instance, Hankook Ventus takes a position ahead of Pirelli P ZERO. However, the tables turn in the 'Autobild' and 'Sportauto' tests, where P ZERO shines in the top spot, leaving Hankook Ventus few places behind. Interestingly, in 'Autoexpress' test, they finish quite close to each other with Hankook entering the 4th position and Pirelli coming in just behind at 5th table point.

In conclusion, both the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 and Pirelli P ZERO are sound investments, each with its distinct strengths. Hankook Ventus can be considered for its consistent all-round performance as it typically places in the top third of most testing groups. In contrast, Pirelli P ZERO might grab your attention if your focus spotlights towards superior performance in 'Dry braking', and 'Wet handling.' However, their rankings across multiple tests show that both brands deliver competitive quality, and hence, the preference would rely on the specific requirements of the rider.