Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Nexen N Fera Primus vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

It's a close competition between the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and the Nexen N Fera Primus. Both sets of tires have their strengths and weaknesses, as will be seen below.

The Hankook Ventus Prime 4, a touring type and a summer variant, had previously replaced the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 model. Our rating for this tire stands at a strong 85%. In Autobild's test, it shone in the second position out of 51 tires, demonstrating its exceptional performance in dry braking, dry handling, and wet braking. According to ADAC, it also demonstrates dynamic behavior on wet and dry tracks, but its mileage could be improved.

In contrast, the Nexen's N Fera Primus, falls under the UHP (Ultra High Performance) sub-category. It stands as a strong contender with an 80% rating from our test results. It stood tenth in Autobild's test, standing out for its superb aquaplaning - longitudinal performance. ADAC noted its good braking performance and dynamic wet handling, but it had issues with delayed steering response and limited mileage/economy.

Final verdict: If your primary concern is dry and wet handling, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 may be your best bet. However, if you often drive in wet conditions and aquaplaning is a concern, you might want to take a closer look at the Nexen N Fera Primus. Keep in mind the mileage when planning for longer-term usage for either tyre.

In conclusion, both tyres performed commendably well, each with its unique strengths. The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 excels in dry and wet handling while the Nexen Fera Primus outperforms in aquaplaning situations. Your choice will ultimately depend on driving habits and conditions..