Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Premium

Hankook

Ventus Prime 4

VS

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Ventus Prime 4

ION Evo

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

13

1

10

3

Best position

#2

#1

#2

Average position

6.2

1.0

6.0

3.3

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

530

64

104

40

Wet

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

74%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Wet braking

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

71%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Aquaplaning - cross

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

59%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Wet circle cornering

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Wet handling

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Comfort

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Exterior noise

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Comfort

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

72%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Interior noise

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Offroad

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

74%

Dry

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry braking

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

83%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dry handling

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Costs

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rolling resistance

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Mileage

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

70%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Prime 4

ION Evo

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Offroad

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison