18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

When it comes to selecting a perfect tyre for your vehicle, both Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and Fulda EcoControl HP2 are popular choices, each with its unique merits. The Hankook Ventus Prime 4, which replaced the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125, is known for dynamic behavior on both wet and dry tracks, shorter dry braking distances, and lower rolling resistance. Despite these positives, it does exhibit slight weaknesses in terms of efficiency and environmental balance. The overall rating of Ventus Prime 4 stands at 77%.


The Fulda EcoControl HP2, the successor to the Fulda EcoControl HP, scored well in terms of environmental balance, tread life, wear, and efficiency. However, it was slightly less balanced overall and struggled on wet tracks. It carries an overall rating of 69%. For more details about these tyres, you can visit Hankook's website and Fulda's website.


Comparing their performances in various tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ranked better overall. It claimed the 4th position in the Autobild test out of 55 tyres, while the Fulda EcoControl HP2 secured the 16th position, excelling particularly in exterior noise. The positions were relatively similar in the ADAC test, where the Hankook Ventus Prime secured the 9th spot out of 50, and the Fulda EcoControl ranked 13th.


Verdict: Both tyres have their merits and minor drawbacks. However, if you prioritize dynamic behavior, dry braking distances, and overall balanced performance, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is a better option. If environmental balance, tread life, and noise are higher on your list of priorities, you may want to consider the Fulda EcoControl HP2 instead.

Test Profile

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
13
8
3
Best position
#2
#4
#2
Average position
6.2
12.8
3.7
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
Available sizes
530
30
34

Wet

Wet
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
63%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
72%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Offroad

Offroad
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%

Dry

Dry
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
79%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
70%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison