18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

When it comes to selecting a perfect tyre for your vehicle, both Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and Fulda EcoControl HP2 are popular choices, each with its unique merits. The Hankook Ventus Prime 4, which replaced the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125, is known for dynamic behavior on both wet and dry tracks, shorter dry braking distances, and lower rolling resistance. Despite these positives, it does exhibit slight weaknesses in terms of efficiency and environmental balance. The overall rating of Ventus Prime 4 stands at 77%.


The Fulda EcoControl HP2, the successor to the Fulda EcoControl HP, scored well in terms of environmental balance, tread life, wear, and efficiency. However, it was slightly less balanced overall and struggled on wet tracks. It carries an overall rating of 69%. For more details about these tyres, you can visit Hankook's website and Fulda's website.


Comparing their performances in various tests, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ranked better overall. It claimed the 4th position in the Autobild test out of 55 tyres, while the Fulda EcoControl HP2 secured the 16th position, excelling particularly in exterior noise. The positions were relatively similar in the ADAC test, where the Hankook Ventus Prime secured the 9th spot out of 50, and the Fulda EcoControl ranked 13th.


Verdict: Both tyres have their merits and minor drawbacks. However, if you prioritize dynamic behavior, dry braking distances, and overall balanced performance, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is a better option. If environmental balance, tread life, and noise are higher on your list of priorities, you may want to consider the Fulda EcoControl HP2 instead.

Test Profile

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
13
8
26
Best position
#2
#4
#1
Average position
6.2
12.8
2.2
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
Available sizes
530
30
66

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Fulda EcoControl HP2
68%
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Wet Braking
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
91%
Wet Handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Wet Circle Cornering
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
67%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
57%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
57%
Continental PremiumContact 7
66%
Aquaplaning Cross
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
66%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
66%
Dry Performance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Dry Braking
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry Handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
53%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Comfort & Noise
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Fulda EcoControl HP2
91%
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Continental PremiumContact 7
64%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Noise Exterior
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
64%
Economy
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
72%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Fulda EcoControl HP2
84%
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Rolling Resistance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Mileage
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison