18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and Continental PremiumContact 7 are two mainstream summer touring tyres often compared in independent tests. On our scale the Ventus Prime 4 scores 71%, while the PremiumContact 7 is rated significantly higher at 98%. You can read the full tyre pages here: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and Continental PremiumContact 7. Manufacturer pages: Hankook and Continental. Neither model has been replaced by a newer generation at the time of these tests.


Across multiple major test outlets (ADAC, AutoBild, Aftonbladet, Vibilagare, Autoklub ČR and Tyre Reviews), the Continental PremiumContact 7 consistently finishes at or near the top. It is the test winner in ADAC and several other test programs, praised for industry-leading wet and dry performance, shortest braking distances, and strong reserves at the limits. Test summaries call out “best properties on dry and wet roads,” “shortest wet and dry braking,” and “very good predicted wear and low fuel consumption.”


The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 produces a more mixed picture. In comparative tests it typically places mid-field to upper mid-field (positions range from 4th to 9th across different test programs). Test highlights for the Ventus Prime 4 include good dry handling and short dry braking, dynamic behaviour and low rolling resistance in some reports, and acceptable wet braking in certain tests. But several testers note weaker wet performance compared with class leaders, lower aquaplaning resistance, higher external noise and only moderate mileage.



  • Wet performance: Continental clearly leads — top marks for wet braking and wet handling in ADAC, Autobild and TyreReviews. Hankook shows acceptable short wet braking in some tests but overall has a weaker wet performance and lower aquaplaning resistance.

  • Dry performance: Both tyres offer strong dry handling, but Continental’s dry braking and handling are repeatedly rated better, making it safer and more confidence-inspiring at the limit.

  • Comfort and noise: Continental scores highly for comfort; Hankook is noted for some exterior noise issues in a few tests.

  • Rolling resistance and wear: Continental is praised for low fuel consumption and very good projected mileage. Hankook shows low rolling resistance in some reports but generally has moderate expected wear.


Summary verdict: the Continental PremiumContact 7 is the superior tyre in nearly every direct comparison — it is the safer, more balanced choice with top wet and dry stopping performance, strong handling, good comfort and class-leading longevity. The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is a competent, value-oriented alternative if you prioritise good dry grip and lower rolling resistance, but it is outperformed by Continental in wet grip, aquaplaning resistance, noise and predicted wear.


Recommendation: if you want the best all-round summer touring tyre and top test results, choose the Continental (PremiumContact 7) and consider the manufacturer page for detailed specs (Continental). If budget and dry performance are your main priorities, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 offers good dry braking and handling at a lower price point; see the Hankook brand page for more information (Hankook).

Test Profile

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
13
26
18
10
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#2
Average position
6.2
2.2
6.1
6.0
Latest test
2026
2026
2024
2026
Available sizes
530
66
47
104

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
58%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
65%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Wet Braking
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
48%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Wet Handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
53%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet Circle Cornering
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
88%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
65%
Aquaplaning Cross
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
55%
Continental PremiumContact 7
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
62%
Dry Performance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
51%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
86%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Dry Braking
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Dry Handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
32%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
93%
Comfort & Noise
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
61%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Noise Exterior
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
60%
Noise Interior
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
53%
Continental PremiumContact 7
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Economy
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Continental PremiumContact 7
78%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Rolling Resistance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Mileage
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
83%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View
ADACADAC
Summer
2024215/55 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison