18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin e.Primacy

Let's examine the details of two tyres for comparison: the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and the BFGoodrich Advantage. Both are summer tyres, designed for durability and performance in warmer weather conditions.


The Hankook Ventus Prime 4, a touring tyre, replaced the previous model Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125. With our rating of 81%, this tyre shines in terms of dry braking, dry handling, and wet braking, according to the Autobild test. The model also shows a dynamic driving behavior on wet and dry tracks and a low rolling resistance as per ADAC 2017's results. However, it does show some weaknesses in its environmental balance and efficiency, plus a slight weakness in aquaplaning. The tyre delivers excellent handling on both dry and wet tracks with a good price-to-performance ratio. Visit the official website for more information.


On the other hand, the BFGoodrich Advantage has been noted for its comfort, appearing at 20th place in the Autobild test. Its strengths include dynamic dry handling, quiet running noise, low rolling resistance, and a reasonable price according to Autobild 2024. Despite these assets, the tyre tends to understeer in wet conditions and has a longer braking distance. It offers a stable ride and short braking distances on dry tracks, however, it has understeering handling behavior and extended braking distances in the wet. Check out the official website for more specifications.


In mutual test positions, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 generally outranks the BFGoodrich Advantage, suggesting better overall performance. It placed second in the Autobild test out of 51 tyres, and ninth in the ADAC test out of 50. The BFGoodrich Advantage, meanwhile, came 20th in the Autoblild test and 21st in the ADAC test.


In conclusion, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 stands out for its efficiency, handling and price-performance ratio, while the BFGoodrich Advantage appeals for its comfort and dry performance. A careful consideration of these strengths and weaknesses along with driver’s individual needs can lead to the ideal tyre selection. For a broader choice, one can refer to the respective manufacturers Hankook and BFGoodrich.

Test Profile

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Michelin
e.Primacy
Number of tests
13
14
4
Best position
#2
#8
#3
Average position
6.2
13.4
12.0
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
530
153
111

Wet

Wet
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Wet braking
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Wet circle cornering
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Wet handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Exterior noise
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Comfort
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%

Offroad

Offroad
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%

Dry

Dry
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Dry handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Dry braking
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%

Costs

Costs
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Rolling resistance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Mileage
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison