18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

3 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Let's examine the details of two tyres for comparison: the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and the BFGoodrich Advantage. Both are summer tyres, designed for durability and performance in warmer weather conditions.


The Hankook Ventus Prime 4, a touring tyre, replaced the previous model Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125. With our rating of 81%, this tyre shines in terms of dry braking, dry handling, and wet braking, according to the Autobild test. The model also shows a dynamic driving behavior on wet and dry tracks and a low rolling resistance as per ADAC 2017's results. However, it does show some weaknesses in its environmental balance and efficiency, plus a slight weakness in aquaplaning. The tyre delivers excellent handling on both dry and wet tracks with a good price-to-performance ratio. Visit the official website for more information.


On the other hand, the BFGoodrich Advantage has been noted for its comfort, appearing at 20th place in the Autobild test. Its strengths include dynamic dry handling, quiet running noise, low rolling resistance, and a reasonable price according to Autobild 2024. Despite these assets, the tyre tends to understeer in wet conditions and has a longer braking distance. It offers a stable ride and short braking distances on dry tracks, however, it has understeering handling behavior and extended braking distances in the wet. Check out the official website for more specifications.


In mutual test positions, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 generally outranks the BFGoodrich Advantage, suggesting better overall performance. It placed second in the Autobild test out of 51 tyres, and ninth in the ADAC test out of 50. The BFGoodrich Advantage, meanwhile, came 20th in the Autoblild test and 21st in the ADAC test.


In conclusion, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 stands out for its efficiency, handling and price-performance ratio, while the BFGoodrich Advantage appeals for its comfort and dry performance. A careful consideration of these strengths and weaknesses along with driver’s individual needs can lead to the ideal tyre selection. For a broader choice, one can refer to the respective manufacturers Hankook and BFGoodrich.

Test Profile

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
13
14
10
Best position
#2
#8
#2
Average position
6.2
13.4
6.0
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
530
153
104

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Wet Braking
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Wet Handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
74%
Wet Circle Cornering
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Aquaplaning Cross
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
59%
Dry Performance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
87%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Dry Braking
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Dry Handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Comfort & Noise
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Noise Exterior
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
74%
Ride Comfort
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Economy
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Rolling Resistance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Mileage
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2026225/50 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison