18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Let's examine the details of two tyres for comparison: the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and the BFGoodrich Advantage. Both are summer tyres, designed for durability and performance in warmer weather conditions.


The Hankook Ventus Prime 4, a touring tyre, replaced the previous model Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125. With our rating of 81%, this tyre shines in terms of dry braking, dry handling, and wet braking, according to the Autobild test. The model also shows a dynamic driving behavior on wet and dry tracks and a low rolling resistance as per ADAC 2017's results. However, it does show some weaknesses in its environmental balance and efficiency, plus a slight weakness in aquaplaning. The tyre delivers excellent handling on both dry and wet tracks with a good price-to-performance ratio. Visit the official website for more information.


On the other hand, the BFGoodrich Advantage has been noted for its comfort, appearing at 20th place in the Autobild test. Its strengths include dynamic dry handling, quiet running noise, low rolling resistance, and a reasonable price according to Autobild 2024. Despite these assets, the tyre tends to understeer in wet conditions and has a longer braking distance. It offers a stable ride and short braking distances on dry tracks, however, it has understeering handling behavior and extended braking distances in the wet. Check out the official website for more specifications.


In mutual test positions, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 generally outranks the BFGoodrich Advantage, suggesting better overall performance. It placed second in the Autobild test out of 51 tyres, and ninth in the ADAC test out of 50. The BFGoodrich Advantage, meanwhile, came 20th in the Autoblild test and 21st in the ADAC test.


In conclusion, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 stands out for its efficiency, handling and price-performance ratio, while the BFGoodrich Advantage appeals for its comfort and dry performance. A careful consideration of these strengths and weaknesses along with driver’s individual needs can lead to the ideal tyre selection. For a broader choice, one can refer to the respective manufacturers Hankook and BFGoodrich.

Test Profile

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
13
14
26
Best position
#2
#8
#1
Average position
6.2
13.4
2.2
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
530
153
66

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Wet Braking
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
91%
Wet Handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Wet Circle Cornering
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
57%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Continental PremiumContact 7
66%
Aquaplaning Cross
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
66%
Dry Performance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
BFGoodrich Advantage
74%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Dry Braking
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry Handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Comfort & Noise
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
BFGoodrich Advantage
82%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental PremiumContact 7
64%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Noise Exterior
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
64%
Economy
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
72%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Rolling Resistance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Mileage
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2026225/50 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison