18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
3
10
3
Best position
#2
#2
#2
Average position
3.3
6.0
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
60
104
34

Wet

Wet
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Costs

Costs
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dry

Dry
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison