18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Hankook Ventus Evo vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Dunlop Winter

Test Profile

Hankook
Ventus Evo
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Dunlop
Winter
Number of tests
3
23
2
Best position
#2
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
6.7
1.5
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
60
107
65

Wet

Wet
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Wet braking
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Wet circle cornering
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Wet handling
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Dunlop Winter
67%

Costs

Costs
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Mileage
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Price/value
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Rolling resistance
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Dunlop Winter
81%

Dry

Dry
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Dry handling
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Dry braking
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Dunlop Winter
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Exterior noise
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison