Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Hankook

Kinergy 4S2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Kinergy 4S2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Number of tests

4

3

1

4

5

3

Best position

#2

#1

#3

#1

#2

Average position

5.0

3.3

1.0

12.0

2.2

3.7

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

—

40

27

111

63

34

Snow

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Wet

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet handling

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet braking

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Comfort

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry braking

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Costs

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Kinergy 4S2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Snow

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison