Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Upper-middle

Hankook

Kinergy 4S2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Kinergy 4S2

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

P ZERO PZ4

Number of tests

4

16

4

3

1

14

Best position

#2

#3

#2

#1

#2

Average position

5.0

5.5

12.0

3.3

1.0

5.5

Latest test

2025

2023

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

—

153

111

40

64

706

Wet

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Wet handling

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Wet braking

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Wet circle cornering

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Snow

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

78%

Comfort

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Exterior noise

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Comfort

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

74%

Costs

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Rolling resistance

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

Mileage

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

51%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Dry

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Dry handling

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

Dry braking

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Kinergy 4S2

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Comfort

Costs

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison