Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Upper-middle

Hankook

Kinergy 4S2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Kinergy 4S2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

4

3

1

5

Best position

#2

#1

Average position

5.0

3.7

3.3

1.0

2.2

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

—

34

40

27

63

Wet

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Wet handling

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - cross

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Wet braking

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet circle cornering

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Snow

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Snow handling

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

73%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

71%

Snow traction

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

76%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

76%

Snow braking

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

85%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Comfort

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Comfort

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry handling

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dry braking

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Costs

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolling resistance

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Mileage

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

51%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Kinergy 4S2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison