Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S H740 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

Kinergy 4S H740

R13 – R18

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Kinergy 4S H740

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

—

3

1

Best position

—

#2

#1

Average position

—

3.7

1.0

Latest test

—

2025

Available sizes

100

34

64

Wet

Hankook Kinergy 4S H740

58%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Hankook Kinergy 4S H740

67%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Hankook Kinergy 4S H740

62%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet handling

Hankook Kinergy 4S H740

44%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Hankook Kinergy 4S H740

78%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Snow

Hankook Kinergy 4S H740

47%

Dry

Hankook Kinergy 4S H740

71%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Hankook Kinergy 4S H740

71%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Comfort

Hankook Kinergy 4S H740

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Hankook Kinergy 4S H740

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Costs

Hankook Kinergy 4S H740

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S H740 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Kinergy 4S H740

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison