Segment
1. Hankook ION FlexClimate Premium2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Hankook (86%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 has a better rating of 92% compared to 90% of the Hankook ION FlexClimate. The first tyre test of Hankook ION FlexClimate was done in 2025, compared to 2021 when was the Michelin CrossClimate 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2025 245/45 R19 test, where both the ION FlexClimate and the CrossClimate 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Hankook ION FlexClimate dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin CrossClimate 2 also have B wet ratings.
# | Hankook ION FlexClimate
| Michelin CrossClimate 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook ION FlexClimate Premium2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner2. Hankook ION FlexClimate Very good
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
Hankook iON FlexClimate Rating: Very good | 1- | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | |||
michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | |||
Show test details |