Comparison: Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Hankook

ION FlexClimate

VS

Ecsta PS71

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

ION FlexClimate

Ecsta PS71

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

15

3

Best position

#1

#2

Average position

1.0

9.0

3.7

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

27

225

34

Wet

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet handling

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Snow

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Comfort

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Hankook ION FlexClimate

74%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex

ION FlexClimate

Ecsta PS71

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison