18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Test Profile

Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Number of tests
1
10
33
Best position
#1
#2
#1
Average position
1.0
6.0
4.1
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
27
104
658

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Wet braking
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Wet handling
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%

Snow

Snow
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Dry braking
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Dry handling
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Exterior noise
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
Comfort
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Rolling resistance
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison