18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
16
4
3
2
3
3
Best position
#1
#3
#3
#2
#1
#2
#2
Average position
1.0
5.5
12.0
3.3
1.0
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2025
2023
2025
2026
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
27
153
111
40
23
34
40

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Snow

Snow
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolling resistance
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison