Comparison: Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Upper-middle

Hankook

ION FlexClimate

VS

Advantage

Ecsta PS71

8.3

R16 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

ION FlexClimate

Advantage

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

1

14

15

Best position

#1

#8

#2

Average position

1.0

13.4

9.0

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

27

153

225

Wet

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Wet braking

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Wet handling

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Snow

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Comfort

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Comfort

Hankook ION FlexClimate

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry braking

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Dry handling

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Costs

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Rolling resistance

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

ION FlexClimate

Advantage

Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison