Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

BluEarth-XT

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

ION Evo

BluEarth-XT

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

3

Best position

#1

#7

#2

Average position

1.0

7.0

3.7

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

64

—

34

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

89%

Hankook

ION Evo

69%

Falken

e.Ziex

Wet Braking

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

62%

Falken e.Ziex

62%

Wet Handling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

59%

Wet Circle Cornering

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

77%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

38%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning Cross

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry Performance

92%

Hankook

ION Evo

70%

Falken

e.Ziex

Dry Braking

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

64%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry Handling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

67%

Falken e.Ziex

67%

Comfort & Noise

66%

Hankook

ION Evo

66%

Falken

e.Ziex

Noise Exterior

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

95%

Falken e.Ziex

66%

Economy

76%

Hankook

ION Evo

78%

Falken

e.Ziex

Rolling Resistance

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

96%

Mileage

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
Autobild	Summer	2025	215/55 R18	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Falken e.Ziex

ION Evo

BluEarth-XT

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison