18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Falken e.Ziex

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Vredestein ULTRAC

Vredestein

ULTRAC

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Hankook

ION Evo

Vredestein

ULTRAC

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

—

3

Best position

#1

—

#2

Average position

1.0

—

3.7

Latest test

2025

—

2025

Available sizes

64

—

34

Wet

Wet

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet handling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Vredestein ULTRAC

85%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Vredestein ULTRAC

93%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Vredestein ULTRAC

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Vredestein ULTRAC

88%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Costs

Costs

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Vredestein ULTRAC

56%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Vredestein ULTRAC

67%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Vredestein ULTRAC

29%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Comfort

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Vredestein ULTRAC

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Vredestein ULTRAC

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Dry

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Vredestein ULTRAC

82%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Vredestein ULTRAC

86%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Vredestein ULTRAC

83%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison