Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Premium

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Eskimo HP2

Blizzak 6

9.1

R16 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

ION Evo

Eskimo HP2

Blizzak 6

Number of tests

1

15

14

Best position

#1

#6

#1

Average position

1.0

15.5

3.6

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

64

28

188

Wet

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Sava Eskimo HP2

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Wet handling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Sava Eskimo HP2

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Aquaplaning - cross

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Sava Eskimo HP2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Wet braking

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Sava Eskimo HP2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Sava Eskimo HP2

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Wet circle cornering

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Sava Eskimo HP2

59%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Costs

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Sava Eskimo HP2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Price/value

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Sava Eskimo HP2

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Rolling resistance

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Sava Eskimo HP2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Mileage

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Sava Eskimo HP2

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Comfort

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Sava Eskimo HP2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Exterior noise

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Sava Eskimo HP2

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Dry

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Sava Eskimo HP2

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Dry braking

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Sava Eskimo HP2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Dry handling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Sava Eskimo HP2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

ION Evo

Eskimo HP2

Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison