18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Petlas Snowmaster W651 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Petlas Snowmaster W651Budget
PetlasPetlas

Snowmaster W651

1.4
R15 – R18
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Hankook
ION Evo
Petlas
Snowmaster W651
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
6
3
Best position
#1
#9
#2
Average position
1.0
38.0
3.7
Latest test
2025
2023
2025
Available sizes
64
11
34

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Petlas Snowmaster W651
37%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Petlas Snowmaster W651
33%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Petlas Snowmaster W651
43%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Petlas Snowmaster W651
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Petlas Snowmaster W651
4%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Petlas Snowmaster W651
63%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Petlas Snowmaster W651
44%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Petlas Snowmaster W651
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison