18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
Primacy 5
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
1
3
3
2
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
1.0
4.7
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
64
126
34
23

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Wet braking
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet handling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolling resistance
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Exterior noise
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry braking
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Dry handling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison