18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Michelin Pilot Sport 5Premium
MichelinMichelin

Pilot Sport 5

9.5
R16 – R21
Kumho Ecsta PS71Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta PS71

8.3
R16 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
Pilot Sport 5
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
1
14
15
Best position
#1
#1
#2
Average position
1.0
3.4
9.0
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
64
70
225

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet braking
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet circle cornering
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet handling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Price/value
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Rolling resistance
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Mileage
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry handling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Dry braking
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Exterior noise
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison