18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
4
2
3
Best position
#1
#3
#1
#2
Average position
1.0
12.0
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
64
111
23
34

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison