18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Falken e.Ziex

Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

8.7
R17 – R21
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Hankook
ION Evo
Kumho
Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
3
3
Best position
#1
#1
#2
Average position
1.0
4.0
3.7
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
64
54
34

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
62%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
76%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
52%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
52%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
69%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
71%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison