18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Dunlop Winter

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Dunlop Winter

Dunlop

Winter

Also compare with

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Hankook

ION Evo

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Dunlop

Winter

Number of tests

1

15

2

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

1.0

9.0

1.5

Latest test

2025

2025

2025

Available sizes

64

225

65

Wet

Wet

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Aquaplaning - cross

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Wet braking

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Wet circle cornering

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Wet handling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Costs

Costs

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Price/value

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Rolling resistance

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Mileage

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Dry

Dry

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Dry handling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Dry braking

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Comfort

Comfort

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Comfort

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Exterior noise

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison