18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Michelin Primacy 5

Michelin

Primacy 5

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Hankook

ION Evo

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Michelin

Primacy 5

Number of tests

1

10

3

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

1.0

6.0

4.7

Latest test

2025

2026

2026

Available sizes

64

104

126

Wet

Wet

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Wet circle cornering

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Wet handling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Wet braking

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Costs

Costs

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Rolling resistance

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Mileage

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Comfort

Comfort

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Comfort

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Exterior noise

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Dry

Dry

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Dry braking

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin Primacy 5

76%

Dry handling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin Primacy 5

69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison