18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Hankook

ION Evo

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

10

3

Best position

#1

#2

#2

Average position

1.0

6.0

3.7

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

64

104

34

Wet

Wet

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet circle cornering

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Costs

Costs

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Comfort

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Dry

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison