18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Test Profile

Hankook
ION Evo
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Number of tests
1
10
33
Best position
#1
#2
#1
Average position
1.0
6.0
4.1
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
64
104
658

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Wet circle cornering
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Wet handling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Wet braking
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Mileage
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Price/value
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%
Rolling resistance
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Exterior noise
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Dry braking
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Dry handling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison