18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Kumho (59%). In this particular case, the Hankook ION Evo has a better rating of 90% compared to 74% of the Kumho Ecsta HS52. The first tyre test of Hankook ION Evo was done in 2025, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Hankook ION Evo dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (75%) of the Kumho Ecsta HS52 also have A wet ratings. We also know where ION Evo is made - Hungary.

Test Profile

Hankook
ION Evo
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
1
10
Best position
#1
#2
Average position
1.0
6.0
Latest test
2025
2026
Available sizes
64
104

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet circle cornering
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Wet handling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Rolling resistance
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Comfort
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Exterior noise
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry handling
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison