Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Premium

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WinterCraft WP52+

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Blizzak 6

Number of tests

1

3

5

14

Best position

#1

#2

#4

#1

Average position

1.0

3.3

4.3

2.2

3.6

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

64

40

97

63

188

Wet

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Aquaplaning - cross

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Wet braking

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Wet circle cornering

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Wet handling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Costs

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Price/value

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Rolling resistance

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Mileage

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Dry

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Dry handling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Dry braking

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Comfort

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Comfort

Hankook ION Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Exterior noise

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WinterCraft WP52+

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison