Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Premium

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Primacy

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

1

16

4

2

3

Best position

#1

#3

#1

#2

Average position

1.0

5.5

12.0

1.0

3.3

Latest test

2025

2023

2025

2026

Available sizes

64

153

111

23

40

Wet

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Wet circle cornering

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Wet handling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Aquaplaning - cross

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Wet braking

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Costs

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Mileage

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Rolling resistance

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Comfort

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Comfort

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Exterior noise

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Dry

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry braking

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dry handling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Primacy

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison