Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Premium

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

e.Ziex

Potenza Sport

8.7

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Potenza Sport

Number of tests

1

3

23

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

1.0

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

64

34

188

Wet

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

75%

Wet braking

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

86%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

79%

Wet circle cornering

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

92%

Wet handling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

93%

Costs

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

61%

Rolling resistance

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

58%

Price/value

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

63%

Comfort

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

80%

Comfort

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

70%

Exterior noise

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

70%

Dry

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

88%

Dry braking

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

88%

Dry handling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Potenza Sport

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison