Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Premium

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Turanza 6

Ecsta HS52

7.4

R14 – R20

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

ION Evo

Turanza 6

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

1

13

10

Best position

#1

#2

Average position

1.0

6.2

6.0

Latest test

2025

2026

Available sizes

64

225

104

Wet

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Wet braking

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Wet circle cornering

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Wet handling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Costs

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Rolling resistance

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Mileage

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Dry

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Dry handling

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Dry braking

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Comfort

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

62%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Comfort

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Exterior noise

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

65%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Hankook ION Evo vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

ION Evo

Turanza 6

Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison