18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Kumho (59%). The first tyre test of Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 was done in 2016, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 69% of Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 has B wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating.

Test Profile

Hankook
Dynapro HP2 RA33
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
2
10
Best position
#5
#2
Average position
8.0
6.0
Latest test
2017
2026
Available sizes
70
104

Wet

Wet
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Wet circle cornering
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
42%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Wet handling
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
48%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Costs

Costs
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Dry

Dry
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison