18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Hankook
Dynapro HP2 RA33
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
2
3
2
3
Best position
#5
#2
#1
#2
Average position
8.0
3.7
1.0
3.3
Latest test
2017
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
70
34
23
40

Wet

Wet
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
59%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet handling
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
48%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet braking
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
64%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
42%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dry

Dry
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
81%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Costs

Costs
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
75%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
70%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison