18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Gt
Radial Fe2
Toyo
Proxes CF2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
2
3
1
Best position
#8
#2
#1
Average position
17.5
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
74
34
64

Wet

Wet
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Toyo Proxes CF2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Toyo Proxes CF2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet braking
Gt Radial Fe2
69%
Toyo Proxes CF2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Toyo Proxes CF2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Toyo Proxes CF2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Toyo Proxes CF2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
82%
Toyo Proxes CF2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Exterior noise
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dry

Dry
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Gt Radial Fe2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Gt Radial Fe2
72%
Toyo Proxes CF2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison