Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Gt

Radial Fe2

R14 – R18

VS

Upper-middle

Toyo

Proxes CF2

R14 – R18

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8

R14 – R20

Also compare with

Turanza T005

Quadraxer 3

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test Profile

Radial Fe2

Proxes CF2

Advantage

Number of tests

—

2

14

Best position

—

#8

Average position

—

17.5

13.4

Latest test

—

2019

2026

Available sizes

—

74

153

Wet

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Toyo Proxes CF2

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Aquaplaning - cross

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Toyo Proxes CF2

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Wet braking

Gt Radial Fe2

69%

Toyo Proxes CF2

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Toyo Proxes CF2

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Wet circle cornering

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

Toyo Proxes CF2

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Wet handling

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

Toyo Proxes CF2

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Comfort

Gt Radial Fe2

82%

Toyo Proxes CF2

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Exterior noise

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Dry

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Dry braking

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Dry handling

Gt Radial Fe2

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Costs

Gt Radial Fe2

67%

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Mileage

Gt Radial Fe2

72%

Toyo Proxes CF2

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Rolling resistance

Gt Radial Fe2

65%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Radial Fe2

Proxes CF2

Advantage

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison