Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Riken Road Performance vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

Gt

Radial Fe2

R14 – R18

VS

Riken

Road Performance

R15 – R16

Upper-middle

Kumho

HA32 Solus 4S

4.9

R13 – R20

Also compare with

Quatrac

CrossClimate 2

Turanza All Season 6

Test Profile

Radial Fe2

Road Performance

HA32 Solus 4S

Number of tests

—

9

Best position

—

#5

Average position

—

10.8

Latest test

—

2023

Available sizes

—

73

Wet

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Riken Road Performance

70%

Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

67%

Aquaplaning - cross

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Riken Road Performance

76%

Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

62%

Wet braking

Gt Radial Fe2

69%

Riken Road Performance

63%

Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Riken Road Performance

74%

Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

68%

Wet circle cornering

Gt Radial Fe2

79%

Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

71%

Wet handling

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

70%

Comfort

Gt Radial Fe2

82%

Riken Road Performance

74%

Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

76%

Exterior noise

Gt Radial Fe2

74%

Riken Road Performance

74%

Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

80%

Dry

Gt Radial Fe2

75%

Riken Road Performance

74%

Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

68%

Dry braking

Gt Radial Fe2

80%

Riken Road Performance

74%

Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

63%

Dry handling

Gt Radial Fe2

71%

Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

73%

Costs

Gt Radial Fe2

67%

Riken Road Performance

67%

Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

65%

Rolling resistance

Gt Radial Fe2

65%

Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

59%

Mileage

Gt Radial Fe2

72%

Riken Road Performance

67%

Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Riken Road Performance vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

Radial Fe2

Road Performance

HA32 Solus 4S

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison