18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Riken Road Performance vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Gt Radial Fe2
GtGt

Radial Fe2

R14 – R18
Riken Road Performance
RikenRiken

Road Performance

R15 – R16
Firestone Roadhawk 2Upper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3) Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Gt
Radial Fe2
Riken
Road Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
—
—
6
Best position
—
—
#3
Average position
—
—
4.7
Latest test
—
—
2026
Available sizes
—
—
146

Wet

Wet
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Riken Road Performance
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Riken Road Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet braking
Gt Radial Fe2
69%
Riken Road Performance
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet circle cornering
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Wet handling
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
82%
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Exterior noise
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Dry

Dry
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry braking
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Dry handling
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Costs

Costs
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Riken Road Performance
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolling resistance
Gt Radial Fe2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Mileage
Gt Radial Fe2
72%
Riken Road Performance
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison