18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Riken Road Performance vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Gt Radial Fe2
GtGt

Radial Fe2

R14 – R18
Riken Road Performance
RikenRiken

Road Performance

R15 – R16
BFGoodrich AdvantageUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Also compare with
Turanza T005 Efficient Grip Performance 2 Proxes Comfort

Test Profile

Gt
Radial Fe2
Riken
Road Performance
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
—
—
14
Best position
—
—
#8
Average position
—
—
13.4
Latest test
—
—
2026
Available sizes
—
—
153

Wet

Wet
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Riken Road Performance
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Riken Road Performance
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Wet braking
Gt Radial Fe2
69%
Riken Road Performance
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet circle cornering
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Wet handling
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%

Comfort

Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
82%
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Dry

Dry
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry braking
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Dry handling
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Costs

Costs
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Riken Road Performance
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rolling resistance
Gt Radial Fe2
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Mileage
Gt Radial Fe2
72%
Riken Road Performance
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison